30,000-leagues-under-the-sea Deep

Abstract conversation is often belittled by people engaged in it. It's seen as worthless, the topics impractical or the goals unattainable. "Back to matters at hand", we say after a deep conversation- "What's for dinner?" I think its the same feeling you get after discussing an obscure hobby or pastime with a group of friends. You sometimes feel self-critical afterwards. I believe it's the desire to fit in with a larger group that can keep us from indulging properly in our unique interests. Just as much as Magic the Gathering or video-gaming, philosophy can be a guilty pleasure. But it's the guilty pleasure most influential to achieving harmony, peace, or any whichever human ideal that our race is supposedly striving for. 

Maybe 98% of your community does not have the interest and/or ability to think critically and abstractly. They might find that what's for dinner is a real issue, more important than contemplating some big idea. Don't be fooled. Use that big head of yours and put things in perspective. Guilt free mother fucker. 

Dr. Seuss level $hit

Are you any different than your neighbors, those comrades -thick and rubberized- with blood in their belly's but not much anywhere else? Forget them. They're always around too often, anyways. Let's hear more about you. The trees have the lorax, but who is your spokesman? No one corporate, no. A sports icon, not really. Someone artistic, in the media? Maybe. But who? Thompson's dead and so is Ginsberg. Dammit. God gets the timing all wrong. Where is the modern voice of critique, that sharp knife of a word, to cut the loud mouths down to size. Only it can express what I feel but cannot write or say. And I need It badly. It needs to put Him in perspective. And guide me with reason, never faith. Tell me if you've figured it out.

A.G